http://mitcho.com/blog/projects/solving-a-romantic-problem-portmanteaued-prepositions/ Tue, 27 Dec 2011 23:04:23 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4-alpha-19719 http://mitcho.com/blog/projects/solving-a-romantic-problem-portmanteaued-prepositions/comment-page-1/#comment-1302 mitcho Wed, 13 May 2009 07:12:04 +0000 http://mitcho.com/blog/?p=2019#comment-1302 <p>Alright, upon discussion with Blair I'm updating the spec so that the output of <code>normalizeArgument()</code> is of the form {prefix: '', newInput: '', suffix: ''}. For example, {prefix: 'la ', newInput: 'table', suffix: ''}.</p> Alright, upon discussion with Blair I'm updating the spec so that the output of normalizeArgument() is of the form {prefix: '', newInput: '', suffix: ''}. For example, {prefix: 'la ', newInput: 'table', suffix: ''}.

]]> http://mitcho.com/blog/projects/solving-a-romantic-problem-portmanteaued-prepositions/comment-page-1/#comment-1301 mitcho Wed, 13 May 2009 07:07:13 +0000 http://mitcho.com/blog/?p=2019#comment-1301 <p>Blair, are you referring to the output of <code>normalizeArgument()</code>? It may indeed make more sense as an object, although the current spec lets it trivially be the output of <code>String.match()</code>. Hmph.</p> Blair, are you referring to the output of normalizeArgument()? It may indeed make more sense as an object, although the current spec lets it trivially be the output of String.match(). Hmph.

]]> http://mitcho.com/blog/projects/solving-a-romantic-problem-portmanteaued-prepositions/comment-page-1/#comment-1300 Blair McBride Wed, 13 May 2009 06:53:17 +0000 http://mitcho.com/blog/?p=2019#comment-1300 <p>Shouldn't that be an object, rather than an array?</p> Shouldn't that be an object, rather than an array?

]]>